This post is from John Banks:

Rutilius’ pattern of interspersing praise for Rome with the story of the actual journey provides an interesting backdrop to the beginning. Since the initial praise of Rome comes prior to the discussion of where and why Rutilius is leaving, Rutilius’ association of himself with Gaul demonstrates a clear hierarchy. Rutilius praises the Romans from Rome as being blessed and more worthy even than Romans from other parts of the Empire. However, he portrays himself in a fashion that indicates he is better than those in Gaul. His constant mentions of his unwillingness to go, his obligation to Gaul and praise of Rome are lock step with descriptions of Gaul as war torn and barbarous. His love of Rome and unwillingness then are a way of dissociating himself from Gaul while still being involved with Gaul. Even after the first 65 line, Rutilius has yet to explain what it is he is going to do in Gaul. Yet mixed in with the praise is also hints at discord within the empire he is apparently praising; the roads are flooded and there are lands that have been attacked. It’s an interesting contrast that Rutilius layers nicely throughout the beginning. Rutilius mention devastation offhandedly; the devestation comes as an explanation of how he is making his journey, not why.